Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy ›› 2023, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4): 381-389.doi: 10.37015/AUDT.2023.230036
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Sebastián Eustaquio Martín Pérez, MSca,b,c,d, Raúl Hernández García, PTc, Alberto Brito Lorenzo, PTc, Carlos Daniel Sabater Cruz, PTc, Mario Herrera Pérez, PhDe,f, Fidel Rodríguez Hernández, PhDa, Kristin Briem, PhDg,h, Isidro Miguel Martín Pérez, MDa,b,*()
Received:
2023-05-17
Revised:
2023-06-15
Accepted:
2023-06-19
Online:
2023-12-30
Published:
2023-10-23
Contact:
Departamento de Farmacología y Medicina Física, Área de Radiología y Medicina Física, Sección de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. e-mail: Sebastián Eustaquio Martín Pérez, MSc, Raúl Hernández García, PT, Alberto Brito Lorenzo, PT, Carlos Daniel Sabater Cruz, PT, Mario Herrera Pérez, PhD, Fidel Rodríguez Hernández, PhD, Kristin Briem, PhD, Isidro Miguel Martín Pérez, MD. Ultrasonographic Identification of Muscle Atrophy in Hamstring Muscles after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair among Soccer Players: A Case-control Study. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(4): 381-389.
Figure 2
Ultrasonography measurements process. Ultrasonography measurements through L12-4S probe with TE7 device (MINDRAY ®, USA). (A) CSA-BFlh30 measured by ultrasonography 30% away from its origin; (B) CSA-ST30 measured by ultrasonography 30% away from its origin; (C) CSA-BFlh70 measured by ultrasonography 70% away from its origin; (D) CSA-ST70 measured by ultrasonography 70% away from its origin."
Table 1
Demographic description of the sample"
Item | Group | N | Mean | SD | Min. | Max. | Shapiro-Wilk | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W | P | |||||||
Age | Post-ACLR | 15 | 25.13 | 4.13 | 21 | 33 | 0.85 | 0.023 |
Control | 15 | 24.00 | 4.08 | 19 | 33 | 0.85 | 0.018 | |
Height (m) | Post- ACLR | 15 | 1.78 | 0.07 | 1.68 | 1.95 | 0.94 | 0.425 |
Control | 15 | 1.76 | 0.08 | 1.59 | 1.89 | 0.94 | 0.513 | |
Weight (Kg) | Post- ACLR | 15 | 82.39 | 9.71 | 68.90 | 99.30 | 0.91 | 0.170 |
Control | 15 | 78.95 | 15.01 | 52.30 | 103.60 | 0.95 | 0.612 | |
BMI (Kg/m2) | Post- ACLR | 15 | 25.85 | 2.09 | 22.25 | 30.58 | 0.98 | 0.986 |
Control | 15 | 25.19 | 3.48 | 19.89 | 30.24 | 0.92 | 0.223 | |
% Fat mass | Post-ACLR | 15 | 22.14 | 1.69 | 19.70 | 24.60 | 0.93 | 0.300 |
Control | 15 | 23.43 | 2.61 | 19.00 | 27.90 | 0.94 | 0.460 | |
% Muscle mass | Post-ACLR | 15 | 41.59 | 1.48 | 39.70 | 44.30 | 0.93 | 0.354 |
Control | 15 | 42.74 | 1.70 | 40.10 | 45.10 | 0.90 | 0.131 | |
% Bone Mass | Post-ACLR | 15 | 11.42 | 0.77 | 10.10 | 12.50 | 0.92 | 0.260 |
Control | 15 | 11.67 | 0.70 | 10.30 | 12.70 | 0.95 | 0.590 | |
% Water | Post-ACLR | 15 | 52.13 | 1.97 | 49.60 | 56.10 | 0.92 | 0.251 |
Control | 15 | 53.86 | 2.76 | 50.80 | 58.50 | 0.88 | 0.047 |
Table 2
Description of the study variables of the sample"
Item | Group | N | Mean | SEM | SD | Min. | Max. | Shapiro-Wilk | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W | P | ||||||||
CSA-BFlh30 | Post-ACLR | 15 | 8.79 | 0.36 | 1.41 | 6.61 | 11.66 | 0.96 | 0.69 |
Control | 15 | 8.87 | 0.59 | 2.31 | 4.29 | 14.36 | 0.95 | 0.65 | |
CSA-BFlh70 | Post-ACLR | 15 | 6.91 | 0.26 | 1.01 | 5.05 | 8.45 | 0.94 | 0.49 |
Control | 15 | 7.01 | 0.37 | 1.45 | 4.33 | 9.11 | 0.94 | 0.43 | |
CSA-ST30 | Post-ACLR | 15 | 8.42 | 0.41 | 1.59 | 5.48 | 11.22 | 0.98 | 0.96 |
Control | 15 | 9.16 | 0.24 | 0.94 | 7.56 | 10.93 | 0.95 | 0.64 | |
CSA-ST70 | Post-ACL | 15 | 1.43 | 0.26 | 1.02 | 0.28 | 3.34 | 0.90 | 0.10 |
Control | 15 | 2.65 | 0.17 | 0.66 | 1.82 | 4.44 | 0.83 | 0.01 |
Table 3
Analysis of intergroup differences"
Item | Statistical | df | P | MD | SEM | Effect Size | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSA-BFlh30 | Test Student | -0.12 | 28.0 | 0.903 | -0.08 | 0.70 | -0.04 |
CSA-BFlh70 | Test Student | -0.21 | 28.0 | 0.832 | -0.09 | 0.45 | -0.07 |
CSA-ST30 | Test Student | -1.53 | 28.0 | 0.136 | -0.73 | 0.47 | -0.56 |
CSA-ST70 | Test Student | -3.86 | 28.0 | <.001 | -1.22 | 0.31 | 1.41 |
[1] |
Veltri DM. Anterior arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 1997; 16:123-144.
doi: 10.1016/S0278-5919(05)70010-7 |
[2] | Petersen W, Forkel P, Achtnich A, Zantop T. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement surgery using the single bundle technique. Surgical Techniques in Orthopedics and Traumatology 2014; 23:11-26. |
[3] | Suydam SM, Cortes DH, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Buchanan TS. Semitendinosus tendon for ACL reconstruction: Regrowth and mechanical property recovery. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5:2325967117712944. |
[4] |
Palazzolo A, Rosso F, Bonasia DE, Saccia F, Rossi R; Knee Committee SIGASCOT. Uncommon complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Joints 2018; 6:188-203.
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675799 pmid: 30582108 |
[5] |
Konrath JM, Vertullo CJ, Kennedy BA, Bush HS, Barrett RS, Lloyd DG. Morphologic characteristics and strength of the hamstring muscles remain altered at 2 years after use of a hamstring tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44:2589-2598.
doi: 10.1177/0363546516651441 pmid: 27432052 |
[6] |
Snow BJ, Wilcox JJ, Burks RT, Greis PE. Evaluation of muscle size and fatty infiltration with MRI nine to eleven years following hamstring harvest for ACL reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94:1274-1282.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00692 pmid: 22810397 |
[7] | Cuzzolin M, Previtali D, Zaffagnini S, Deabate L, Candrian C, Filardo G. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus nonoperative treatment: Better function and less secondary meniscectomies but no difference in knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis. Cartilage 2021; 13:1658S-1670S. |
[8] | Márquez Arabia WH, Márquez Arabia JJ, Gómez JC. What about anterior cruciate ligament injuries, their treatment, recovery of function and long-term development of osteoarthritis? Is there room for conservative treatment? Review of current concepts. Colombian Journal of Orthopedics and Traumatology 2017;31:75-86. |
[9] |
Keays SL, Newcombe PA, Bullock-Saxton JE, Keays AC. The development of long-term osteoarthritis following anterior cruciate ligament injury: reconstruction vs no reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:3201-3211.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04662-4 |
[10] |
Lepley LK, Davi SM, Burland JP, Lepley AS. Muscle atrophy after ACL injury: implications for clinical practice. Sports Health 2020; 12:579-586.
doi: 10.1177/1941738120944256 |
[11] | Farfán Cabello E. Morphological bases of hamstring muscles for the understanding of their intrinsic injuries. (Doctoral thesis). Doctoral programme in surgery and morphological sciences. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 2020. |
[12] |
Noehren B, Andersen A, Hardy P, Johnson DL, Ireland ML, Thompson KL, et al. Cellular and morphological alterations in the vastus lateralis muscle as the result of ACL injury and reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98:1541-1547.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00035 pmid: 27655981 |
[13] |
Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Toritsuka Y, Nakamura N. Changes in cross-sectional area of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament grafts as a function of time following transplantation. Arthroscopy 2005; 21:917-922.
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.006 pmid: 16084288 |
[14] | Sánchez Barrancos IM, Manso García S, Lozano Gago P, Hernández Rodríguez T, Conangla Ferrín L, Ruiz Serrano AL, et al. Usefulness and reliability of musculoskeletal clinical ultrasound in family medicine (2): muscle injuries, osteoarthritis, rheumatological diseases and ultrasound-guided procedures. Aten Primary 2019;51:105-117. |
[15] | Hjaltadóttir AÞ, Hafsteinsson D, Árnason Á, Briem K. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of proximal and distal hamstrings cross sectional area in individuals with history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Physiother Theory Pract 2022:1-7. |
[16] |
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007; 335:806-808.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD |
[17] |
Kositsky A, Gonçalves BAM, Stenroth L, Barrett RS, Diamond LE, Saxby DJ. Reliability and validity of ultrasonography for measurement of hamstring muscle and tendon cross-sectional area. Ultrasound Med Biol 2020; 46:55-63.
doi: S0301-5629(19)31513-3 pmid: 31668942 |
[18] |
Sayer AA, Cruz-Jentoft A. Sarcopenia definition, diagnosis and treatment: consensus is growing. Age Ageing 2022; 51:afac220.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac220 |
[19] |
Horteur C, Rubens Duval B, Merlin A, Cognault J, Ollivier M, Pailhe R. Comparison of knee extensor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either quadriceps tendon or hamstring tendon autografts. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2022; 32:857-865.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03062-5 pmid: 34152474 |
[20] | Balki S, Eldemir S. Hamstring weakness at 90° flexion of involved knee as an indicator of the function deficit in males after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).Acta Bioeng Biomech 2021;23:147-153. |
[21] | Morrissey MC, Brewster CE. Hamstring weakness after surgery for anterior cruciate injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1986; 7:310-313. |
[22] |
Gould N, Donnermeyer D, Gammon GG, Pope M, Ashikaga T. Transcutaneous muscle stimulation to retard disuse atrophy after open meniscectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; 178:190-197.
doi: 10.1097/00003086-198309000-00022 |
[23] | Ji Y, Li M, Chang M, Liu R, Qiu J, Wang K, et al. Inflammation: roles in skeletal muscle atrophy. Antioxidants (Basel) 2022; 11:1686. |
[24] |
Lepley LK, Davi SM, Burland JP, Lepley AS. Muscle atrophy after ACL injury: implications for clinical practice. Sports Health 2020; 12:579-586.
doi: 10.1177/1941738120944256 |
[25] |
Gao Y, Arfat Y, Wang H, Goswami N. Muscle atrophy induced by mechanical unloading: mechanisms and potential countermeasures. Front Physiol 2018; 9:235.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00235 pmid: 29615929 |
[26] |
Sherman DA, Rush JL, Glavian NR, North GE. Hamstrings muscle morphology after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2021; 51:1733-1750.
doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01431-y pmid: 33638795 |
[27] |
Tampere T, Victor J, Luyckx T, Vermue H, Arnout N, Witvrouw E, et al. Biceps femoris compensates for semitendinosus after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a hamstring autograft: a muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging study in male soccer players. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:1470-1481.
doi: 10.1177/03635465211003309 |
[1] | Lujing Li, MD, Zuofeng Xu, MD. The Value of VTTQ Combined with B-mode US for Distinguishing Benign from Malignant Breast Masses by Comparing with SE: A Clinical Research [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(4): 394-400. |
[2] | Rodanthi Sfakiotaki, MS, Sergia Liasi, BM, Eleni Papaiakovou, BM, Irene Vraka, PhD, Marina Vakaki, PhD, Chrysoula Koumanidou, PhD. Juvenile Granulosa Cell Tumor of the Testis: A Preoperative Approach of the Diagnosis with Ultrasound [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(4): 409-411. |
[3] | Yiming Li, BM, Jing Xiao, MD, Fang Xie, MD, Yu Lin, BM, Mingbo Zhang, MD, Yukun Luo, MD. The Value of CEUS in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Thyroid Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(4): 412-415. |
[4] | Nianyu Xue, MM, Shengmin Zhang, BS. Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms Involving the Testis: A Case Report [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(4): 420-422. |
[5] | Shuangyu Wu, MM , Xinling Zhang, MD . Advances and Applications of Transperineal Ultrasound Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(3): 235-247. |
[6] | Bo Jiang, MD, Yiman Du, MD, Xiang Fei, MD, Jianing Zhu, MD, Lianhua Zhu, MD, Qiuyang Li, MD, Yukun Luo, MD, PhD. Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter May Replace B-mode Ultrasound in Diagnosing Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(3): 260-266. |
[7] | Tianxiang Li, BS, Fei Ji, BS, Ruina Zhao, MD, Huazhen Liu, MD, Meng Yang, MD. Advances in the Research of Ultrasound and Artificial Intelligence in Neuromuscular Disease [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(2): 122-129. |
[8] | Zheng Zhang, MS, Li Liu, MD, Desheng Sun, MD, Dirong Zhang, MD, Fengbei Kong, MS, Yalin Wu, PhD, Yu Shi, MD. Application of the Virtual Reality in the Teaching of Ultrasonography [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(2): 193-196. |
[9] | Cuiwei Wang, MD, Xin-Hua Ye, MD. Sarcomatoid Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Report [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 38-41. |
[10] | Yixin Zhang, MS, Yuli Zhao, MS, Yuwen Su, MS, Sen Wang, MS, Li Feng, MD. Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Giant Cystic Meconium Peritonitis in Fetus Following in Vitro Fertilization: A Case Report [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 42-46. |
[11] | Ping Wang, MM, Yuqun Luo, MM, Yunkai Li, MM, Wensheng Yue, MD, Duo Huang, MD, Xuemei Lin, MM, Shaoli Xie, MM, Bin Xiong, MM. A Misdiagnosed Cervical Vagal Schwannoma: A Case Report and Review of Its Imaging Features and Differential Diagnosis [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 53-56. |
[12] | Shi Qiao, MM, Shaote Wang, MD, Yao Deng, MD, Feixiang Xiang, MD, Xiaojuan Qin, MD. Characterization of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei Originating from Ovarian Borderline Mucinous Tumor Using Ultrasonography: A Case Report [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 57-59. |
[13] | Qiaoer Gong, BS, Nianyu Xue, MS. Application and Progress of Ultrasound Technology in Atherosclerosis [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 8-15. |
[14] | Xiaojuan Yang, MD, Huihui Yang, MD, Yu He,MD, PhD. Diagnostic Values of CEUS, CECT and CEMRI for Renal Cystic Lesions on the Current Bosniak Criterion-A Meta-analysis [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2022, 6(4): 165-173. |
[15] | Ping Xu, MM, Heping Deng, MD, Bo Lu, MD, Yaru Mi, MM. Peripheral Nerve Lipomatosis: Pathology, Clinical Features, Imaging Diagnosis and Treatment [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2022, 6(4): 174-179. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Share: WeChat
Copyright ©2018 Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy
|
Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy (AUDT) a> is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License a>.