Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy ›› 2023, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (3): 235-247.doi: 10.37015/AUDT.2023.220044
• Review Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Shuangyu Wu, MM , Xinling Zhang, MD ()
Received:
2023-02-23
Revised:
2023-02-23
Accepted:
2023-03-01
Online:
2023-09-30
Published:
2023-10-09
Contact:
MD ,
E-mail:zhxinl@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Shuangyu Wu, MM , Xinling Zhang, MD . Advances and Applications of Transperineal Ultrasound Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(3): 235-247.
Figure 2
Determination of pelvic floor organs mobility and hiatal area. Ultrasound images show the mid-sagittal plane at rest (A, C) and on Valsalva (B, D, E), and a rendered axial plane on Valsalva (F). RL, reference line, indicates the interior symphyseal margin; d1-d1’, d2-d2’, d3-d3’ demonstrate the measurements of distances between the RL and bladder neck, cervix and rectal ampulla at rest and on maximal Valsalva, respectively; a1-a1’, a2-a2’ show the tilt angle and the retro-vesical angle of the urethra at rest and on maximal Valsalva. The yellow dotted curve in (F) indicates the hiatal area."
Figure 4
Tomographic imaging of a normal anal sphincter. A set of 8 slices is obtained from the level of the puborectalis muscle to the level of the subcutaneous component of the EAS to bracket the entire EAS. The left arrow indicates the caudad termination of the IAS, and the right arrow indicates the dorso-cranial termination of the EAS. Slice thickness is adjusted individually to include slices from above the EAS to below the IAS. The EAS is represented by slices 2-7, with slice 1 showing the subcutaneous part of the EAS which often is difficult to interpret due to artefact. EAS, external anal sphincter; IAS, internal anal sphincter."
Figure 7
Mid-urethral sling (arrow) in the midsagittal plane at rest (A) and on maximal Valsalva (B), and the rendered axial plane on maximal Valsalva (C). The distance measurement in (B) shows the sling-pubis gap, the most suitable measure of sling ‘tightness’. In this case, it is about average at 1 cm. SP, symphysis pubis; BL, bladder; A, anal."
Figure 8
Mid-sagittal planes (A, B) and axial plane (C) of patient with anterior and posterior vaginal mesh. The anterior mesh is visible dorsal to the proximal urethra and trigone (the left arrows in image ‘A, B’ and the above arrows in image ‘C’), the posterior mesh anterior to the rectal ampulla (the right arrows in image ‘A, B’ and the below arrows in image ‘C’). At rest (A), both meshes are in normal shape and position; on Valsalva (B), there is a significant recurrent enterocele in the posterior compartment."
[1] |
Expert Panel on GYN, Imaging OB, Khatri G, Bhosale PR, Robbins JB, Akin EA, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria® pelvic floor dysfunction in females. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S137-S155.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.016 pmid: 35550798 |
[2] | Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008; 300:1311-1316. |
[3] |
Gomelsky A, Penson DF, Dmochowski RR. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery: the evidence for the repairs. BJU Int 2011; 107:1704-1719.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10123.x pmid: 21592280 |
[4] |
Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89:501-506.
doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6 pmid: 9083302 |
[5] |
Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1096-1100.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f73729 pmid: 20966694 |
[6] |
Raju R, Linder BJ. Evaluation and management of pelvic organ prolapse. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96:3122-3129.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.09.005 pmid: 34863399 |
[7] |
Dietz HP, Hansell NK, Grace ME, Eldridge AM, Clarke B, Martin NG. Bladder neck mobility is a heritable trait. BJOG 2005; 112:334-339.
doi: 10.1111/bjo.2005.112.issue-3 |
[8] |
Dietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017; 60:58-81.
doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000264 pmid: 28005595 |
[9] |
Blomquist JL, Munoz A, Carroll M, Handa VL. Association of delivery mode with pelvic floor disorders after childbirth. JAMA 2018; 320:2438-2447.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18315 pmid: 30561480 |
[10] |
Cattani L, Decoene J, Page AS, Weeg N, Deprest J, Dietz HP. Pregnancy, labour and delivery as risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2021; 32:1623-1631.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04724-y pmid: 33704536 |
[11] |
Dietz HP, Clarke B. Prevalence of rectocele in young nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45:391-394.
doi: 10.1111/ajo.2005.45.issue-5 |
[12] |
Dietz HP, Steensma AB. The role of childbirth in the aetiology of rectocele. BJOG 2006; 113:264-267.
doi: 10.1111/bjo.2006.113.issue-3 |
[13] |
Dietz HP, Clarke B, Vancaillie TG. Vaginal childbirth and bladder neck mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42:522-525.
doi: 10.1111/ajo.2002.42.issue-5 |
[14] |
Dietz HP, Bennett MJ. The effect of childbirth on pelvic organ mobility. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:223-228.
pmid: 12907092 |
[15] |
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:10-17.
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0 pmid: 8694033 |
[16] |
Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Broome J. Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18:511-514.
doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00494.x |
[17] |
Nam G, Lee SR, Kim SH, Chae HD. Importance of translabial ultrasound for the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse and its correlation with the POP-Q examination: analysis of 363 cases. J Clin Med 2021; 10:4267.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10184267 |
[18] |
Volloyhaug I, Rojas RG, Morkved S, Salvesen KA. Comparison of transperineal ultrasound with POP-Q for assessing symptoms of prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30:595-602.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3722-3 pmid: 30069728 |
[19] | Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11:CD004014. |
[20] |
Stanford EJ, Cassidenti A, Moen MD. Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23:19-28.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1584-z pmid: 22068321 |
[21] |
Dietz HP, Kamisan Atan I, Salita A. Association between ICS POP-Q coordinates and translabial ultrasound findings: implications for definition of 'normal pelvic organ support'. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47:363-368.
doi: 10.1002/uog.14872 pmid: 25854801 |
[22] |
Dietz HP, Lekskulchai O. Ultrasound assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29:688-691.
doi: 10.1002/uog.v29:6 |
[23] |
Green TH Jr. Urinary stress incontinence: differential diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122:368-400.
pmid: 1093411 |
[24] |
Dietz HP. Female pelvic floor dysfunction--an imaging perspective. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9:113-121.
doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.213 pmid: 22183184 |
[25] |
Dietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:321-334.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.018 pmid: 20350640 |
[26] |
Shek KL, Dietz HP. What is abnormal uterine descent on translabial ultrasound? Int Urogynecol J 2015; 26:1783-1787.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2792-8 pmid: 26174659 |
[27] |
Cheung RYK, Chan SSC, Shek KL, Chung TKH, Dietz HP. Pelvic organ prolapse in Caucasian and East Asian women: a comparative study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53:541-545.
doi: 10.1002/uog.20124 pmid: 30246270 |
[28] |
Wu M, Wang X, Lin X, Fu Y, Chen H, Guan X, et al. Cut-offs for defining uterine prolapse using transperineal ultrasound in Chinese women: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 58:127-132.
doi: 10.1002/uog.23524 pmid: 33094536 |
[29] |
Dietz HP, Steensma AB. Posterior compartment prolapse on two-dimensional and three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26:73-77.
doi: 10.1002/uog.1930 |
[30] | Garcia Mejido JA, Ortega I, Garcia-Jimenez R, Sainz-Bueno JA. Differential diagnosis of posterior compartment prolapse using transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60:142-144. |
[31] |
Viscardi A, Ratto C, Parello A. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the workup of men with obstructed defecation: a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55:976-982.
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825ef8ec pmid: 22874605 |
[32] |
Beer-Gabel M, Assoulin Y, Amitai M, Bardan E. A comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound (DTP-US) with dynamic evacuation proctography (DEP) in the diagnosis of cul de sac hernia (enterocele) in patients with evacuatory dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23:513-519.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0440-1 pmid: 18256847 |
[33] |
Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, Zbar AP. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19:60-67.
pmid: 12761642 |
[34] |
Goforth J, Langaker M. Urinary Incontinence in Women. N C Med J 2016; 77:423-425.
pmid: 27864495 |
[35] | Hunskaar S, Arnold EP, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Herzog AR, Mallett VT. Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2000; 11:301-319. |
[36] |
Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton K, Achtari C, Goldberg R, Mascarenhas T, et al. Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19:5-33.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0495-5 pmid: 18026681 |
[37] |
DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:1713-1720; discussion 1720-1723.
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70346-9 pmid: 8203431 |
[38] |
Dickie KJ, Shek KL, Dietz HP. The relationship between urethral mobility and parity. BJOG 2010; 117:1220-1224.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02649.x |
[39] |
Pirpiris A, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Urethral mobility and urinary incontinence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36:507-511.
doi: 10.1002/uog.7658 pmid: 20503229 |
[40] |
Shi Q, Wen L, Zhao B, Huang S, Liu D. The Association of Hiatal Dimensions and Urethral Mobility With Stress Urinary Incontinence. J Ultrasound Med 2022; 41:671-677.
doi: 10.1002/jum.v41.3 |
[41] |
Zhao B, Wen L, Liu D, Huang S. The visualized urethral mobility profile in stress urinary incontinence described by four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 2022; 41:1439-1445.
doi: 10.1002/jum.v41.6 |
[42] | Zhao B, Wen L, Shi Q, Liu D, Huang S. The association between urethral configuration and mobility and female stress urinary incontinence investigated by transperineal ultrasound. Chin J Ultrasonogr 2021:615-619. |
[43] |
Dietz HP, Wilson PD. The influence of bladder volume on the position and mobility of the urethrovesical junction. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1999; 10:3-6.
pmid: 10207759 |
[44] | Peschers UM, Vodusek DB, Fanger G, Schaer GN, DeLancey JO, Schuessler B. Pelvic muscle activity in nulliparous volunteers. Neurourol Urodyn 2001; 20:269-275. |
[45] |
Turkoglu A, Coskun ADE, Arinkan SA, Vural F. The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence cases. Int Braz J Urol 2022; 48:70-77.
doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.1100 |
[46] |
Al-Saadi WI. Transperineal ultrasonography in stress urinary incontinence: The significance of urethral rotation angles. Arab J Urol 2016; 14:66-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.11.003 |
[47] |
Keshavarz E, Pouya EK, Rahimi M, Bozorgan TJ, Saleh M, Tourzani ZM, et al. Prediction of stress urinary incontinence using the retrovesical (beta) angle in transperineal ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 2021; 40:1485-1493.
doi: 10.1002/jum.15526 pmid: 33035377 |
[48] |
Blaivas JG, Flisser AJ, Bleustein CB, Panagopoulos G. Periurethral masses: etiology and diagnosis in a large series of women. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:842-847.
pmid: 15121554 |
[49] |
El-Nashar SA, Bacon MM, Kim-Fine S, Weaver AL, Gebhart JB, Klingele CJ. Incidence of female urethral diverticulum: a population-based analysis and literature review. Int Urogynecol J 2014; 25:73-79.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2155-2 pmid: 23857063 |
[50] |
Patel AK, Chapple CR. Female urethral diverticula. Curr Opin Urol 2006; 16:248-254.
pmid: 16770123 |
[51] |
Cross JJ, Fynes M, Berman L, Perera D. Prevalence of cystic paraurethral structures in asymptomatic women at endovaginal and perineal sonography. Clin Radiol 2001; 56:575-578.
pmid: 11446756 |
[52] |
Lone F, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Long-term outcome of transurethral injection of hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (NASHA/Dx gel) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Int Urogynecol J 2010; 21:1359-1364.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1211-4 pmid: 20571764 |
[53] |
Yang H, Gu JJ, Jiang L, Wang J, Lin L, Wang XL. Ultrasonographic imaging features of female urethral and peri-urethral masses: a retrospective study of 95 patients. Ultrasound Med Biol 2020; 46:1896-1907.
doi: S0301-5629(20)30140-X pmid: 32448559 |
[54] |
Okeahialam NA, Taithongchai A, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Transperineal and endovaginal ultrasound for evaluating suburethral masses: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57:999-1005.
doi: 10.1002/uog.v57.6 |
[55] |
Liu D, Qing Z, Wen L. The use of tomographic ultrasound imaging on three-dimensional translabial ultrasound: a diagnostic sign for urethral diverticulum. Int Urogynecol J 2020; 31:1451-1456.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04111-8 pmid: 31781823 |
[56] |
Gillor M, Dietz HP. Translabial ultrasound imaging of urethral diverticula. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54:552-556.
doi: 10.1002/uog.20305 pmid: 31038237 |
[57] |
Muraca GM, Lisonkova S, Skoll A, Brant R, Cundiff GW, Sabr Y, et al. Ecological association between operative vaginal delivery and obstetric and birth trauma. CMAJ 2018; 190:E734-E741.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171076 |
[58] |
Volloyhaug I, Morkved S, Salvesen O, Salvesen KA.Forceps delivery is associated with increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse and muscle trauma: a cross-sectional study 16-24 years after first delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46:487-495.
doi: 10.1002/uog.14891 pmid: 25920322 |
[59] |
Caudwell-Hall J, Kamisan Atan I, Martin A, Guzman Rojas R, Langer S, Shek K, et al. Intrapartum predictors of maternal levator ani injury. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 96:426-431.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.2017.96.issue-4 |
[60] |
Notten KJB, Kluivers KB, Futterer JJ, Schweitzer KJ, Stoker J, Mulder FE, et al. Translabial three-dimensional ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging in detecting levator ani defects. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124:1190-1197.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000560 pmid: 25415171 |
[61] | Zhuang RR, Song YF, Chen ZQ, Ma M, Huang HJ, Chen JH, et al. Levator avulsion using a tomographic ultrasound and magnetic resonance-based model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:232.e1-e8. |
[62] |
Friedman T, Eslick GD, Dietz HP. Delivery mode and the risk of levator muscle avulsion: a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30:901-907.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3827-8 pmid: 30649566 |
[63] |
Memon HU, Blomquist JL, Dietz HP, Pierce CB, Weinstein MM, Handa VL. Comparison of levator ani muscle avulsion injury after forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted vaginal childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125:1080-1087.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000825 pmid: 25932835 |
[64] |
Dietz HP, Shek KL. Levator defects can be detected by 2D translabial ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20:807-811.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0839-4 pmid: 19495542 |
[65] |
Zhou M, Du H, Ying T, Shui W, Dou C. Value of high-frequency two-dimensional ultrasound on evaluating puborectalis muscle. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 301:1347-1352.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05523-4 pmid: 32266525 |
[66] |
Kreft M, Cai P, Furrer E, Richter A, Zimmermann R, Kimmich N. 2D pelvic floor ultrasound imaging in identifying levator ani muscle trauma agrees highly with 4D ultrasound imaging. Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33:2781-2790.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05198-2 pmid: 35503120 |
[67] |
van Delft K, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Kluivers KB. Does the prevalence of levator ani muscle avulsion differ when assessed using tomographic ultrasound imaging at rest vs on maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46:99-103.
doi: 10.1002/uog.14719 pmid: 25366807 |
[68] |
Dietz HP, Pattillo Garnham A, Guzman Rojas R. Is it necessary to diagnose levator avulsion on pelvic floor muscle contraction? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49:252-256.
doi: 10.1002/uog.15832 pmid: 26616261 |
[69] | Van Delft KW, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Levator avulsion using a tomographic ultrasound and magnetic resonance-based model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:e7. |
[70] |
Dietz HP, Abbu A, Shek KL. The levator-urethra gap measurement: a more objective means of determining levator avulsion? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32:941-945.
doi: 10.1002/uog.6268 pmid: 19035543 |
[71] | Abdool Z, Shek KL, Dietz HP. The effect of levator avulsion on hiatal dimension and function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201:89.e1-5. |
[72] |
Shek KL, Dietz HP. The effect of childbirth on hiatal dimensions. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:1272-1278.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a5ef23 pmid: 19461422 |
[73] |
DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller JM, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:295-302.
doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000250901.57095.ba pmid: 17267827 |
[74] |
Dietz HP, Shek C. Levator avulsion and grading of pelvic floor muscle strength. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19:633-636.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0491-9 pmid: 17999021 |
[75] |
Dietz HP, Simpson JM. Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 2008; 115:979-984.
doi: 10.1111/bjo.2008.115.issue-8 |
[76] |
Vergeldt TF, van Kuijk SM, Notten KJ, Kluivers KB, Weemhoff M. Anatomical cystocele recurrence: development and internal validation of a prediction model. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127:341-347.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001272 pmid: 26942363 |
[77] |
Durnea CM, O'Reilly BA, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, Durnea UA, Smyth MM, et al. Status of the pelvic floor in young primiparous women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46:356-362.
doi: 10.1002/uog.14711 pmid: 25359670 |
[78] |
van Delft KW, Thakar R, Sultan AH, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. The natural history of levator avulsion one year following childbirth: a prospective study. BJOG 2015; 122:1266-1273.
doi: 10.1111/bjo.2015.122.issue-9 |
[79] |
Dietz HP, Shek KL, Low GK. All or nothing? A second look at partial levator avulsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60:693-697.
doi: 10.1002/uog.v60.5 |
[80] |
Yu CH, Chan SSC, Cheung RYK, Chung TKH. Prevalence of levator ani muscle avulsion and effect on quality of life in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2018; 29:729-733.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3454-9 pmid: 28840274 |
[81] |
Diez-Itza I, Avila M, Uranga S, Belar M, Lekuona A, Martin A. Factors involved in prolapse recurrence one year after anterior vaginal repair. Int Urogynecol J 2020; 31:2027-2034.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04468-1 pmid: 32757023 |
[82] |
Wong NKL, Cheung RYK, Lee LL, Wan OYK, Choy KW, Chan SSC. Women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and levator ani muscle avulsion would significantly benefit from mesh repair surgery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57:631-638.
doi: 10.1002/uog.v57.4 |
[83] |
Dietz HP, Kirby A, Shek KL, Bedwell PJ. Does avulsion of the puborectalis muscle affect bladder function? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20:967-972.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0882-1 pmid: 19399355 |
[84] |
Heilbrun ME, Nygaard IE, Lockhart ME, Richter HE, Brown MB, Kenton KS, et al. Correlation between levator ani muscle injuries on magnetic resonance imaging and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:488.e481-486.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.013 |
[85] |
Chantarasorn V, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Sonographic detection of puborectalis muscle avulsion is not associated with anal incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 51:130-135.
doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01273.x pmid: 21466514 |
[86] |
Mathew S, Guzman Rojas RA, Salvesen KA, Volloyhaug I. Levator ani muscle injury and risk for urinary and fecal incontinence in parous women from a normal population, a cross-sectional study. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 38:2296-2302.
doi: 10.1002/nau.v38.8 |
[87] |
Melendez-Munoz J, Subramanian N, Friedman T, Dietz HP. Is levator trauma an independent risk factor for anal incontinence? Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:298-302.
doi: 10.1111/codi.14864 pmid: 31561284 |
[88] |
Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Occult anal sphincter injuries--myth or reality? BJOG 2006; 113:195-200.
doi: 10.1111/bjo.2006.113.issue-2 |
[89] |
Guzman Rojas RA, Shek KL, Langer SM, Dietz HP. Prevalence of anal sphincter injury in primiparous women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42:461-466.
doi: 10.1002/uog.12481 pmid: 23576493 |
[90] |
Oom DM, West RL, Schouten WR, Steensma AB. Detection of anal sphincter defects in female patients with fecal incontinence: a comparison of 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and 2-dimensional endoanal ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55:646-652.
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318251dca1 |
[91] |
Stuart A, Ignell C, Orno AK. Comparison of transperineal and endoanal ultrasound in detecting residual obstetric anal sphincter injury. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98:1624-1631.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.v98.12 |
[92] |
Turel F, Shek KL, Dietz HP. How Valid Is Tomographic Ultrasound Imaging in Diagnosing Levator and Anal Sphincter Trauma? J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38:889-894.
doi: 10.1002/jum.14767 pmid: 30203420 |
[93] | Okeahialam NA, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Comparing diagnostic criteria between endoanal ultrasound and transperineal ultrasound for diagnosing anal sphincter defects: secondary analysis of prospective observational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022. |
[94] |
Subramaniam N, Dietz HP. What is a significant defect of the anal sphincter on translabial ultrasound? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 55:411-415.
doi: 10.1002/uog.20390 pmid: 31271480 |
[95] |
Macmillan AK, Merrie AE, Marshall RJ, Parry BR. The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1341-1349.
doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0593-0 pmid: 15484348 |
[96] |
Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:141-148.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057 |
[97] |
Rømmen K, Schei B, Rydning A, A HS, Morkved S. Prevalence of anal incontinence among Norwegian women: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2012; 2:e001257.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001257 |
[98] |
Rao SS. Pathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004; 126:S14-22.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.013 pmid: 14978634 |
[99] |
Samarasekera DN, Bekhit MT, Wright Y, Lowndes RH, Stanley KP, Preston JP, et al. Long-term anal continence and quality of life following postpartum anal sphincter injury. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10:793-799.
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01445.x pmid: 18266886 |
[100] | Mous M, Muller SA, de Leeuw JW,. Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints. BJOG 2008 ;115(2):234-238. |
[101] |
Guzman Rojas RA, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Anal sphincter trauma and anal incontinence in urogynecological patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46:363-366.
doi: 10.1002/uog.14845 pmid: 25766889 |
[102] |
D'Hoore A, Penninckx F. Obstructed defecation. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5:280-287.
pmid: 12814403 |
[103] |
Martellucci J, Naldini G. Clinical relevance of transperineal ultrasound compared with evacuation proctography for the evaluation of patients with obstructed defaecation. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13:1167-1172.
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02427.x pmid: 20860722 |
[104] |
Beer-Gabel M, Carter D. Comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound and defecography for the evaluation of pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30:835-841.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2195-9 pmid: 25820786 |
[105] |
Dietz HP, Barry C, Lim YN, Rane A. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of suburethral slings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26:175-179.
doi: 10.1002/uog.v26:2 |
[106] |
Wermuth DE, Sheridan A, Oliver J, Glanc P, Khatri G, Bagley A, et al. Translabial ultrasound for assessment of synthetic midurethral sling complications. Ultrasound Q 2021; 37:237-243.
doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000545 pmid: 34478421 |
[107] |
Eisenberg VH, Steinberg M, Weiner Z, Alcalay M, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Schiff E, et al. Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound for imaging mesh implants following sacrocolpopexy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43:459-465.
doi: 10.1002/uog.13303 pmid: 24407819 |
[108] |
Kim KY, Cheng JW, Shen JK, Wagner H, Staack A. Translabial ultrasound evaluation of pelvic floor structures and mesh in the urology office and intraoperative setting. Urology 2018; 120:267.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.07.004 |
[109] |
Tan YH, Frazer MI, Hughes I, Wong V. Correlation between translabial ultrasound parameters and outcomes in retropubic mid-urethral slings: can we predict success? World J Urol 2021; 39:163-168.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03153-8 |
[110] |
Wen L, Shek KL, Subramaniam N, Friedman T, Dietz HP. Correlations between sonographic and urodynamic findings after mid urethral sling surgery. J Urol 2018; 199:1571-1576.
doi: S0022-5347(17)78179-7 pmid: 29288123 |
[111] |
Taithongchai A, Pandeva I, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Association between 3D endovaginal and 2D perineal pelvic floor ultrasound findings and symptoms in women presenting with mid-urethral sling complications. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57:639-646.
doi: 10.1002/uog.23130 pmid: 32959432 |
[112] |
Chan L, Tse V. Pelvic floor ultrasound in the diagnosis of sling complications. World J Urol 2018; 36:753-759.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2253-3 pmid: 29532221 |
[113] |
Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:868-874.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.028 pmid: 15746684 |
[114] |
Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21:437-440.
doi: 10.1002/uog.v21:5 |
[115] |
Nassr AA, Hessami K, Berghella V, Bibbo C, Shamshirsaz AA, Abdolmaleki AS, et al. Angle of progression measured using transperineal ultrasound for prediction of uncomplicated operative vaginal delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60:338-345.
doi: 10.1002/uog.24886 pmid: 35238424 |
[116] |
Peng F, Yu Y, Sun Y, Jiang S, Han Y, Zhang Z. Using transperineal ultrasound to predict labor onset. Ann Transl Med 2019; 7:718.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.11 pmid: 32042734 |
[117] |
Yonetani N, Yamamoto R, Murata M, Nakajima E, Taguchi T, Ishii K, et al. Prediction of time to delivery by transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49:246-251.
doi: 10.1002/uog.15944 pmid: 27089836 |
[118] |
Eggebo TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, Smedvig E, Okland I, Romundstad P, et al. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27:387-391.
doi: 10.1002/uog.v27:4 |
[119] | Youssef A, Brunelli E, Azzarone C, Di Donna G, Casadio P, Pilu G. Fetal head progression and regression on maternal pushing at term and labor outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 58:105-110. |
[120] |
Garcia Mejido JA, Suarez Serrano CM, Fernendez Palacin A, Aquise Pino A, Bonomi Barby MJ, Sainz Bueno JA. Evaluation of levator ani muscle throughout the different stages of labor by transperineal 3D ultrasound. Neurourol Urodyn 2017; 36:1776-1781.
doi: 10.1002/nau.23175 |
[121] | Blasi I, Fuchs I, D'Amico R, Vinci V, La Sala GB, Mazza V, et al. Intrapartum translabial three-dimensional ultrasound visualization of levator trauma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37:88-92. |
[122] |
Gilboa Y, Frenkel TI, Schlesinger Y, Rousseau S, Hamiel D, Achiron R, et al. Visual biofeedback using transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52:91-96.
doi: 10.1002/uog.18962 pmid: 29155474 |
[123] |
Williams H, Cattani L, Van Schoubroeck D, Yaqub M, Sudre C, Vercauteren T, et al. Automatic extraction of hiatal dimensions in 3-D transperineal pelvic ultrasound recordings. Ultrasound Med Biol 2021; 47:3470-3479.
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.08.009 pmid: 34538535 |
[124] |
van den Noort F, van der Vaart CH, Grob ATM, van de Waarsenburg MK, Slump CH, Deep learning enables automatic quantitative assessment of puborectalis muscle and urogenital hiatus in plane of minimal hiatal dimensions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54:270-275.
doi: 10.1002/uog.20181 pmid: 30461079 |
[125] |
van den Noort F, Manzini C, van der Vaart CH, Slump CH, Grob ATM. Automatic identification and segmentation of the slice of minimal hiatal dimensions in transperineal ultrasound volumes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60:570-576.
doi: 10.1002/uog.v60.4 |
[126] |
Huang Z, Qu E, Meng Y, Zhang M, Wei Q, Bai X, et al. Deep learning-based pelvic levator hiatus segmentation from ultrasound images. Eur J Radiol Open 2022; 9:100412.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100412 |
[127] |
Sindhwani N, Barbosa D, Alessandrini M, Heyde B, Dietz HP, D'Hooge J, et al. Semi-automatic outlining of levator hiatus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48:98-105.
doi: 10.1002/uog.15777 pmid: 26434661 |
[128] |
Zhang M, Lin X, Zheng Z, Chen Y, Ren Y, Zhang X. Artificial intelligence models derived from 2D transperineal ultrasound images in the clinical diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33:1179-1185.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04859-y |
[129] |
Wu S, Ren Y, Lin X, Huang Z, Zheng Z, Zhang X. Development and validation of a composite AI model for the diagnosis of levator ani muscle avulsion. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5898-5906.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08754-y pmid: 35362748 |
[130] |
Morin M, Bourbonnais D, Gravel D, Dumoulin C, Lemieux MC. Pelvic floor muscle function in continent and stress urinary incontinent women using dynamometric measurements. Neurourol Urodyn 2004; 23:668-674.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6777 |
[131] |
Majida M, Braekken IH, Bo K, Engh ME. Levator hiatus dimensions and pelvic floor function in women with and without major defects of the pubovisceral muscle. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23:707-714.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1652-4 pmid: 22246577 |
[132] |
Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M, Tanter M. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013; 94:487-495.
doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.01.022 |
[133] |
Franchi-Abella S, Elie C, Correas JM. Ultrasound elastography: advantages, limitations and artefacts of the different techniques from a study on a phantom. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013; 94:497-501.
doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.01.024 |
[134] |
Masslo K, Mollers M, de Murcia KO, Klockenbusch W, Schmitz R. New method for assessment of levator avulsion injury: a comparative elastography study. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38:1301-1307.
doi: 10.1002/jum.14810 pmid: 30208248 |
[135] |
Aljuraifani R, Stafford RE, Hug F, Hodges PW. Female striated urogenital sphincter contraction measured by shear wave elastography during pelvic floor muscle activation: proof of concept and validation. Neurourol Urodyn 2018; 37:206-212.
doi: 10.1002/nau.v37.1 |
[136] |
Kreutzkamp JM, Schafer SD, Amler S, Strube F, Kiesel L, Schmitz R. Strain elastography as a new method for assessing pelvic floor biomechanics. Ultrasound Med Biol 2017; 43:868-872.
doi: S0301-5629(16)30421-5 pmid: 28108041 |
[137] |
Tyloch DJ, Tyloch JF, Adamowicz J, Drewa T. Shear Wave Elastography in the evaluation of the urethral sphincter complex after radical prostatectomy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2021; 47:1681-1691.
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.02.024 pmid: 33820669 |
[138] |
Li XM, Zhang LM, Li Y, Zhu QY, Zhao C, Fang SB, et al. Usefulness of transperineal shear wave elastography of levator ani muscle in women with stress urinary incontinence. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:1873-1880.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03478-5 pmid: 35290481 |
[139] |
Morin M, Salomoni SE, Stafford RE, Hall LM, Hodges PW. Validation of shear wave elastography as a noninvasive measure of pelvic floor muscle stiffness. Neurourol Urodyn 2022; 41:1620-1628.
doi: 10.1002/nau.v41.7 |
[1] | Sebastián Eustaquio Martín Pérez, MSc, Raúl Hernández García, PT, Alberto Brito Lorenzo, PT, Carlos Daniel Sabater Cruz, PT, Mario Herrera Pérez, PhD, Fidel Rodríguez Hernández, PhD, Kristin Briem, PhD, Isidro Miguel Martín Pérez, MD. Ultrasonographic Identification of Muscle Atrophy in Hamstring Muscles after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair among Soccer Players: A Case-control Study [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(4): 381-389. |
[2] | Lujing Li, MD, Zuofeng Xu, MD. The Value of VTTQ Combined with B-mode US for Distinguishing Benign from Malignant Breast Masses by Comparing with SE: A Clinical Research [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(4): 394-400. |
[3] | Rodanthi Sfakiotaki, MS, Sergia Liasi, BM, Eleni Papaiakovou, BM, Irene Vraka, PhD, Marina Vakaki, PhD, Chrysoula Koumanidou, PhD. Juvenile Granulosa Cell Tumor of the Testis: A Preoperative Approach of the Diagnosis with Ultrasound [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(4): 409-411. |
[4] | Yiming Li, BM, Jing Xiao, MD, Fang Xie, MD, Yu Lin, BM, Mingbo Zhang, MD, Yukun Luo, MD. The Value of CEUS in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Thyroid Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(4): 412-415. |
[5] | Nianyu Xue, MM, Shengmin Zhang, BS. Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms Involving the Testis: A Case Report [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(4): 420-422. |
[6] | Bo Jiang, MD, Yiman Du, MD, Xiang Fei, MD, Jianing Zhu, MD, Lianhua Zhu, MD, Qiuyang Li, MD, Yukun Luo, MD, PhD. Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter May Replace B-mode Ultrasound in Diagnosing Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(3): 260-266. |
[7] | Enze Qu, MD, Xinling Zhang, MD. Advanced Application of Artificial Intelligence for Pelvic Floor Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Treatment [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(2): 114-121. |
[8] | Tianxiang Li, BS, Fei Ji, BS, Ruina Zhao, MD, Huazhen Liu, MD, Meng Yang, MD. Advances in the Research of Ultrasound and Artificial Intelligence in Neuromuscular Disease [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(2): 122-129. |
[9] | Zheng Zhang, MS, Li Liu, MD, Desheng Sun, MD, Dirong Zhang, MD, Fengbei Kong, MS, Yalin Wu, PhD, Yu Shi, MD. Application of the Virtual Reality in the Teaching of Ultrasonography [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(2): 193-196. |
[10] | Cuiwei Wang, MD, Xin-Hua Ye, MD. Sarcomatoid Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Report [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 38-41. |
[11] | Yixin Zhang, MS, Yuli Zhao, MS, Yuwen Su, MS, Sen Wang, MS, Li Feng, MD. Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Giant Cystic Meconium Peritonitis in Fetus Following in Vitro Fertilization: A Case Report [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 42-46. |
[12] | Ping Wang, MM, Yuqun Luo, MM, Yunkai Li, MM, Wensheng Yue, MD, Duo Huang, MD, Xuemei Lin, MM, Shaoli Xie, MM, Bin Xiong, MM. A Misdiagnosed Cervical Vagal Schwannoma: A Case Report and Review of Its Imaging Features and Differential Diagnosis [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 53-56. |
[13] | Shi Qiao, MM, Shaote Wang, MD, Yao Deng, MD, Feixiang Xiang, MD, Xiaojuan Qin, MD. Characterization of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei Originating from Ovarian Borderline Mucinous Tumor Using Ultrasonography: A Case Report [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 57-59. |
[14] | Qiaoer Gong, BS, Nianyu Xue, MS. Application and Progress of Ultrasound Technology in Atherosclerosis [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 8-15. |
[15] | Xiaojuan Yang, MD, Huihui Yang, MD, Yu He,MD, PhD. Diagnostic Values of CEUS, CECT and CEMRI for Renal Cystic Lesions on the Current Bosniak Criterion-A Meta-analysis [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2022, 6(4): 165-173. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Share: WeChat
Copyright ©2018 Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy
|
Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy (AUDT) a> is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License a>.