ADVANCED ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY >
Ultrasonographic Identification of Muscle Atrophy in Hamstring Muscles after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair among Soccer Players: A Case-control Study
Received date: 2023-05-17
Revised date: 2023-06-15
Accepted date: 2023-06-19
Online published: 2023-10-23
Objectives To measure the CSA of the HST musculature measured with ultrasonography in soccer players undergoing ACLR and compare limb differences with healthy controls.
Methods A case-control study was performed with patients after anterior cruciate ligament repair (ACLR) and healthy controls in which cross-sectional areas (CSA) obtained using a model TE7 ultrasound machine (MINDRAY ®, USA) in B mode (4.2 to 13 MHz) with a multifrequency linear array transducer (L12-4S). Three CSA images were taken of the semitendinosus muscle (ST) and the long head of the biceps femoris (BFlh), at a distance of 30% and 70% of the ischial tuberosity insertion. Mean differences between groups were analyzed using SPSS v.20 (IBM®, USA), and statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric techniques to determine differences between groups (Student's t-test) and Cohen's correlation coefficient to quantify effect size.
Results 14 ACLR operated 17 ± 5.4 months ago and 12 healthy controls (W = 6; M = 20M; 24.5 ± 3.92 years; BMI = 25.1 ± 2.32 kg/m2) were recruited. There were differences between groups in CSA-ST70 (Post-ACLR = 1.43 ± 1.029 cm2 vs Control 2.65 ± 0.664 cm2, T Student = -3.68, 95% CI [-Inf, -0.648], P < 0. 001, ES = -1.418), but not in CSA-ST30 (Post-ACLR = 8.42 ± 1.596 cm2 vs Control 9.16 ± 0.945 cm2, T Student = -1.535; 95% CI [-Inf, -0.0793], P = 0. 068, ES = -0.5607), CSA-BFlh30 (Post-ACLR = 8.79 ± 1.47 cm2 vs Control 8.87 ± 2.312 cm2, T Student = -0.123; 95% CI [-Inf, 1.1049], P = 0.452, ES = -0. 049) or CSA-BFlh70 (Post-ACLR = 6.91 ± 1.011 cm2 vs Control 7.01 ± 1.453 cm2, T Student = -0.214; 95% CI [-Inf, 0.6795], P = 0.416, ES = -0.0783).
Conclusion Ultrasound measurement of the CSA can be an image marker to identify muscle weakness or atrophy that predicts functional loss early.
Key words: ACLR; Ultrasonography; Atrophy; Hamstring
Sebastián Eustaquio Martín Pérez, MSc , Raúl Hernández García, PT , Alberto Brito Lorenzo, PT , Carlos Daniel Sabater Cruz, PT , Mario Herrera Pérez, PhD , Fidel Rodríguez Hernández, PhD , Kristin Briem, PhD , Isidro Miguel Martín Pérez, MD . Ultrasonographic Identification of Muscle Atrophy in Hamstring Muscles after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair among Soccer Players: A Case-control Study[J]. ADVANCED ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2023 , 7(4) : 381 -389 . DOI: 10.37015/AUDT.2023.230036
[1] | Veltri DM. Anterior arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 1997; 16:123-144. |
[2] | Petersen W, Forkel P, Achtnich A, Zantop T. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement surgery using the single bundle technique. Surgical Techniques in Orthopedics and Traumatology 2014; 23:11-26. |
[3] | Suydam SM, Cortes DH, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Buchanan TS. Semitendinosus tendon for ACL reconstruction: Regrowth and mechanical property recovery. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5:2325967117712944. |
[4] | Palazzolo A, Rosso F, Bonasia DE, Saccia F, Rossi R; Knee Committee SIGASCOT. Uncommon complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Joints 2018; 6:188-203. |
[5] | Konrath JM, Vertullo CJ, Kennedy BA, Bush HS, Barrett RS, Lloyd DG. Morphologic characteristics and strength of the hamstring muscles remain altered at 2 years after use of a hamstring tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44:2589-2598. |
[6] | Snow BJ, Wilcox JJ, Burks RT, Greis PE. Evaluation of muscle size and fatty infiltration with MRI nine to eleven years following hamstring harvest for ACL reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94:1274-1282. |
[7] | Cuzzolin M, Previtali D, Zaffagnini S, Deabate L, Candrian C, Filardo G. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus nonoperative treatment: Better function and less secondary meniscectomies but no difference in knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis. Cartilage 2021; 13:1658S-1670S. |
[8] | Márquez Arabia WH, Márquez Arabia JJ, Gómez JC. What about anterior cruciate ligament injuries, their treatment, recovery of function and long-term development of osteoarthritis? Is there room for conservative treatment? Review of current concepts. Colombian Journal of Orthopedics and Traumatology 2017;31:75-86. |
[9] | Keays SL, Newcombe PA, Bullock-Saxton JE, Keays AC. The development of long-term osteoarthritis following anterior cruciate ligament injury: reconstruction vs no reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:3201-3211. |
[10] | Lepley LK, Davi SM, Burland JP, Lepley AS. Muscle atrophy after ACL injury: implications for clinical practice. Sports Health 2020; 12:579-586. |
[11] | Farfán Cabello E. Morphological bases of hamstring muscles for the understanding of their intrinsic injuries. (Doctoral thesis). Doctoral programme in surgery and morphological sciences. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 2020. |
[12] | Noehren B, Andersen A, Hardy P, Johnson DL, Ireland ML, Thompson KL, et al. Cellular and morphological alterations in the vastus lateralis muscle as the result of ACL injury and reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98:1541-1547. |
[13] | Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Toritsuka Y, Nakamura N. Changes in cross-sectional area of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament grafts as a function of time following transplantation. Arthroscopy 2005; 21:917-922. |
[14] | Sánchez Barrancos IM, Manso García S, Lozano Gago P, Hernández Rodríguez T, Conangla Ferrín L, Ruiz Serrano AL, et al. Usefulness and reliability of musculoskeletal clinical ultrasound in family medicine (2): muscle injuries, osteoarthritis, rheumatological diseases and ultrasound-guided procedures. Aten Primary 2019;51:105-117. |
[15] | Hjaltadóttir AT, Hafsteinsson D, árnason á, Briem K. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of proximal and distal hamstrings cross sectional area in individuals with history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Physiother Theory Pract 2022:1-7. |
[16] | von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, G?tzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007; 335:806-808. |
[17] | Kositsky A, Gon?alves BAM, Stenroth L, Barrett RS, Diamond LE, Saxby DJ. Reliability and validity of ultrasonography for measurement of hamstring muscle and tendon cross-sectional area. Ultrasound Med Biol 2020; 46:55-63. |
[18] | Sayer AA, Cruz-Jentoft A. Sarcopenia definition, diagnosis and treatment: consensus is growing. Age Ageing 2022; 51:afac220. |
[19] | Horteur C, Rubens Duval B, Merlin A, Cognault J, Ollivier M, Pailhe R. Comparison of knee extensor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either quadriceps tendon or hamstring tendon autografts. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2022; 32:857-865. |
[20] | Balki S, Eldemir S. Hamstring weakness at 90° flexion of involved knee as an indicator of the function deficit in males after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).Acta Bioeng Biomech 2021;23:147-153. |
[21] | Morrissey MC, Brewster CE. Hamstring weakness after surgery for anterior cruciate injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1986; 7:310-313. |
[22] | Gould N, Donnermeyer D, Gammon GG, Pope M, Ashikaga T. Transcutaneous muscle stimulation to retard disuse atrophy after open meniscectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; 178:190-197. |
[23] | Ji Y, Li M, Chang M, Liu R, Qiu J, Wang K, et al. Inflammation: roles in skeletal muscle atrophy. Antioxidants (Basel) 2022; 11:1686. |
[24] | Lepley LK, Davi SM, Burland JP, Lepley AS. Muscle atrophy after ACL injury: implications for clinical practice. Sports Health 2020; 12:579-586. |
[25] | Gao Y, Arfat Y, Wang H, Goswami N. Muscle atrophy induced by mechanical unloading: mechanisms and potential countermeasures. Front Physiol 2018; 9:235. |
[26] | Sherman DA, Rush JL, Glavian NR, North GE. Hamstrings muscle morphology after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2021; 51:1733-1750. |
[27] | Tampere T, Victor J, Luyckx T, Vermue H, Arnout N, Witvrouw E, et al. Biceps femoris compensates for semitendinosus after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a hamstring autograft: a muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging study in male soccer players. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:1470-1481. |
/
〈 | 〉 |