Original Research

Evaluation of Features of Adrenal Adenomas and Nonadenomas Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT Biomarkers

  • Wang, MD Xifu ,
  • Dong, BS Xizhong ,
  • Huang, MS Tingting ,
  • Meng, BS Jie ,
  • Kuang, MS Yuanxun ,
  • Kang, BS Jiwen ,
  • Bai, MD Renju ,
  • Li, MD Zhaojun
Expand
  • aDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
    bDepartment of Radiology, Weifang People’s Hospital, Shandong, China
    cDepartment of Radiology, Jiading Jiangqiao Hospital, Shanghai, China
    dDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China

Received date: 2021-07-15

  Revised date: 2021-11-10

  Online published: 2021-12-20

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the correlation between the DCE-CT imaging biomarkers and histological biomarkers of tumor angiogenesis in adrenal adenomas and non-adenomas for the enhancement mechanism of DCE-CT.

Methods: Forty-two patients with 45 adrenal masses including 27 adenomas and 18 non-adenomas diagnosed pathologically were enrolled in this study. The features of DCE-CT (imaging biomarkers) and tumor angiogenesis (histological biomarkers) in adrenal masses were evaluated, and their correlations were explored.

Results: The enhanced features of DCE-CT in adrenal masses were classified: rapid washout group and slow washout group. Type A and C of time density (TD) curves, relative washout rate (Washr) ≥34%, and absolute washout rate (Washa) ≥43% belonged to the rapid group. In contrast, type B, D and E, Washr <34%, and Washa <43% belonged to the slow group. There was significant difference between the biomarkers of DCE-CT in adrenal masses. The rapid group was mainly found in adenomas, whereas the slow was mainly present in nonadenomas. The tumor angiogenesis, histological biomarkers, including microvessel density (MVD), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and microvascular ultrastructures demonstrated significant difference between the rapid and the slow washout group revealed by DCE-CT. The MVD and VEGF expression in rapid group were remarkably higher than those in slow group. Meanwhile, the tumor angiogenesis was also significantly different between adenomas and nonadenomas. The MVD and VEGF expression were also significantly higher in adenomas than those in nonadenomas. Furthermore, different microvascular ultrastructures were identified between adenomas and nonadenomas, which were in accordance with those between the rapid and the slow group. Microvascular ultrastructures in adrenal adenomas and/or the rapid group showed regular lumens and nonstenosis; more pinocytotic vesicles and fenestrations of endothelium; widening of the intercellular space; uniform thinning and better integrity of basal membrane; regular and uniform thinning, along with less stroma of extra vessel space. In comparison, opposite microvascular ultrastructures, in adrenal nonadenomas and/or the slow group.

Conclusion: The close correlation of DCE-CT imaging biomarkers and histological biomarkers of tumor angiogenesis was found between adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas. Tumor angiogenesis in adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas were shown the different enhancement characteristics at DCE-CT.

Cite this article

Wang, MD Xifu , Dong, BS Xizhong , Huang, MS Tingting , Meng, BS Jie , Kuang, MS Yuanxun , Kang, BS Jiwen , Bai, MD Renju , Li, MD Zhaojun . Evaluation of Features of Adrenal Adenomas and Nonadenomas Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT Biomarkers[J]. ADVANCED ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2021 , 5(4) : 304 -312 . DOI: 10.37015/AUDT.2021.210020

References

[1] Koo HJ, Choi HJ, Kim HJ, Kim SO, Cho KS. The value of 15-minute delayed contrast-enhanced CT to differentiate hyperattenuating adrenal masses compared with chemical shift MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24: 1410-1420.
[2] Park SW, Kim TN, Yoon JH, Kim TH, Chung JM, Jeon UB, et al. The washout rate on the delayed CT image as a diagnostic tool for adrenal adenoma verified by pathology: a multicenter study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012; 44: 1397-1402.
[3] Kumagae Y, Fukukura Y, Takumi K, Shindo T, Tateyama A, Kamiyama T, et al. Distinguishing adrenal adenomas from non-adenomas on dynamic enhanced CT: a comparison of 5 and 10 min delays after intravenous contrast medium injection. Clin Radiol. 2013; 68: 696-703.
[4] Sangwaiya MJ, Boland GW, Cronin CG, Blake MA, Halpern EF, Hahn PF. Incidental adrenal lesions: accuracy of characterization with contrast-enhanced washout multidetector CT--10-minute delayed imaging protocol revisited in a large patient cohort. Radiology. 2010; 256: 504-510.
[5] Kamiyama T, Fukukura Y, Yoneyama T, Takumi K, Nakajo M. Distinguishing adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas: combined use of diagnostic parameters of unenhanced and short 5-minute dynamic enhanced CT protocol. Radiology. 2009; 250: 474-481.
[6] Ilias I, Sahdev A, Reznek RH, Grossman AB, Pacak K. The optimal imaging of adrenal tumours: a comparison of different methods. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007; 14: 587-599.
[7] Blake MA, Kalra MK, Sweeney AT, Lucey BC, Maher MM, Sahani DV, et al. Distinguishing benign from malignant adrenal masses: multi-detector row CT protocol with 10-minute delay. Radiology. 2006; 238: 578-585.
[8] Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Platt JF, Dunnick NR, et al. Adrenal masses: characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT. Radiology. 2002; 222: 629-633.
[9] Pena CS, Boland GW, Hahn PF, Lee MJ, Mueller PR. Characterization of indeterminate (lipid-poor) adrenal masses: use of washout characteristics at contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology. 2000; 217(3):798-802.
[10] Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Francis IR, Quint LE, Dunnick NR, Londy F. CT time-attenuation washout curves of adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 170: 747-752.
[11] Szolar DH, Kammerhuber FH. Adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas: assessment of washout at delayed contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology. 1998; 207: 369-375.
[12] Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis--correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324: 1-8.
[13] Peifang L, Runxian B, Yun N, Yong Y. Angiogenesis and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of benign and malignant breast lesions: preliminary results. Chin J Radiol. 2002; 36: 967-972.
[14] Miyagami M, Nakamura S. Ultrastructure of microvessels and tumor cell processes on central neurocytoma. Brain Tumor Pathol. 1997; 14: 79-83.
[15] Schlageter KE, Molnar P, Lapin GD, Groothuis DR. Microvessel organization and structure in experimental brain tumors: microvessel populations with distinctive structural and functional properties. Microvasc Res. 1999; 58: 312-328.
[16] Caruso A, Efficace F, Parrila A, Angelone L, Ferranti F, Grandinetti ML. Pain and anxiety related to mammography in breast cancer patients. Psychological evaluation in an experimental study. Radiol Med. 2001; 102: 335-339.
[17] Caruso RA, Bonanno A, Finocchiaro G, Cavaliere R, Gitto G, Plutino FM, et al. Ultrastructural observations on inflammatory angiogenesis in gastric carcinomas with massive neutrophil infiltration. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2009; 33: 1-5.
[18] Chen Y, Zhang J, Dai J, Feng X, Lu H, Zhou C. Angiogenesis of renal cell carcinoma: perfusion CT findings. Abdom Imaging. 2010; 35: 622-628.
[19] Bai RJ, Cheng XG, Qu H, Shen BZ, Han MJ, Wu ZH. Solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of multi-slice computed tomography perfusion study with vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009; 122: 541-7.
[20] Jiang NC, Han P, Zhou CK, Zheng JL, Shi HS, Xiao J. Dynamic enhancement patterns of solitary pulmonary nodules at multi-detector row CT and correlation with vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density. Ai Zheng. 2009; 28: 164-169.
[21] Chen WX, Min PQ, Song B, Xiao BL, Liu Y, Ge YH. Single-level dynamic spiral CT of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between imaging features and density of tumor microvessels. World J Gastroenterol. 2004; 10: 67-72.
[22] Tateishi U, Kusumoto M, Nishihara H, Nagashima K, Morikawa T, Moriyama N. Contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography for the evaluation of tumor angiogenesis in patients with lung carcinoma. Cancer. 2002; 95: 835-842.
[23] Qin HY, Sun H, Wang X, Bai R, Li Y, Zhao J. Correlation between CT perfusion parameters and microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor in adrenal tumors. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e79911.
[24] Tateishi U, Nishihara H, Watanabe S, Morikawa T, Abe K, Miyasaka K. Tumor angiogenesis and dynamic CT in lung adenocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001; 25: 23-27.
[25] Zhou H, Liu JK, Chen SX, Xiong Z, Lin GQ, Zhou ML, et al. Correlation of blood flow assessed by CT perfusion imaging and microvascular ultrastructure in non-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary study. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2013; 35: 193-7.[In Chinese]
[26] Reitan NK, Thuen M, Goa PE, de Lange Davies C. Characterization of tumor microvascular structure and permeability: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and intravital confocal imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2010; 15: 036004.
Outlines

/