ADVANCED ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY >

2021 , Vol. 5 >Issue 2: 153 - 162

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37015/AUDT.2021.200057

Consensus and Guidelines

Expert Consensus on Some Issues of Cerebral and Carotid Vascular Ultrasonography

  • The Professional Committee of Vascular Ultrasound of Stroke Prevention and Treatment Expert, Committee of the National Health Commission ,
  • The Professional Committee of Superficial Organ and Peripheral Vascular Ultrasound of the Chinese Medical Ultrasound Engineering ,
  • The Professional Committee of Craniocerebral and Cervical Vascular Ultrasound of the Chinese Medical Ultrasound Engineering
Expand

Received date: 2020-07-11

  Revised date: 2020-08-01

  Online published: 2021-06-28

Fold

Abstract

The consensus was established based on some questions of cerebral and carotid ultrasound examination in practice through the collection, elucidation and explanation by three professional committees in the field of vascular ultrasonography, including the Professional Committee of Vascular Ultrasound of Stroke Prevention and Treatment Expert, Committee of the National Health Commission; the Professional Committee of Superficial Organ and Peripheral Vascular Ultrasound of the Chinese Medical Ultrasound Engineering; the Professional Committee of Craniocerebral and Cervical Vascular Ultrasound of the Chinese Medical Ultrasound Engineering, in order to promote the professional field and the level of technology standardization. It has important value in clinic leading and professional guidance.

Key words： Stroke; Carotid arteries; Ultrasonography; Cerebral vascular; Expert consensus

Cite this article

The Professional Committee of Vascular Ultrasound of Stroke Prevention and Treatment Expert, Committee of the National Health Commission , The Professional Committee of Superficial Organ and Peripheral Vascular Ultrasound of the Chinese Medical Ultrasound Engineering , The Professional Committee of Craniocerebral and Cervical Vascular Ultrasound of the Chinese Medical Ultrasound Engineering . Expert Consensus on Some Issues of Cerebral and Carotid Vascular Ultrasonography[J]. ADVANCED ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2021 , 5(2) : 153 -162 . DOI: 10.37015/AUDT.2021.200057

References

[1] Yang Hua. Practical Ultrasound Diagnosis of Carotid Artery and Cerebral Vessels. Beijing: Science Press; 2002. p 149-54.
[2] John S Pellerito, Joseph F Polak. Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography (6th edition). Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012. p25-26.
[3] Stroke Prevention and Treatment Expert Committee of the National Health Commission of China. Guidelines for vascular ultrasound examination of stroke in China. Chin J Med Ultrasound (Electronic edition) 2015; 12:599-610.
[4] Fishbein GA, Fishbein MC. Arteriosclerosis: rethinking the current classification. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133:1309-16.
[5] László Csiba, Claudio Baracchini. Manual of Neurosonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p58-59.
[6] William J. Zwiebel. Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography (4th Edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000. p155-169.
[7] Gon?alves I, den Ruijter H, Nahrendorf M, Pasterkamp G. Detecting the vulnerable plaque in patients. J Intern Med 2015; 278:520-30.
[8] Picano E, Paterni M. Ultrasound tissue characterization of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16:10121-33.
[9] Amamoto T, Sakata N, Ogata T, Shimada H, Inoue T. Intra-plaque vessels on contrast-enhanced ultrasound sonography predict carotid plaque histology. Cerebrovasc Dis 2018; 46:265-9.
[10] Spagnoli LG, Mauriello A, Sangiorgi G, Fratoni S, Bonanno E, Schwartz RS, et al. Extracranial thrombotically active carotid plaque as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. JAMA 2004; 292:1845-52.
[11] Weintraub HS. Identifying the vulnerable patient with rupture-prone plaque. Am J Cardio 2008; 101:3F-10F.
[12] Ohyama H, Mizushige K, Takahashi T, Hosomi N, Kohno M. Plaque rupture on the carotid artery observed by Doppler ultrasonography--a case report. Angiology 2001; 52:867-9.
[13] Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD, Bluth EI, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray scale and Doppler US diagnosis--society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology 2003; 229:340-6.
[14] Hua Y, Liu BB, Ling C, Duan C, Liu Q, Miao Z, et al. Accurate assessment of the diagnosis between 50-69% and 70-99% carotid stenoses with ultrasonography. Chin J Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 3:211-8.
[15] Hua Y, Meng XF, Jia LY, Ling C, Miao ZR, Ling F, et al. Color Doppler imaging evaluation of proximal vertebral artery stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgeno 2009; 193:1434-8.
[16] Hua Y, Jia LY, Li L, Ling C, Miao ZR, Jiao LQ. Evaluation of severe subclavian artery stenosis by color Doppler flow imaging. Ultrasound Med Bio 2011; 37:358-63.
[17] Dharmasaroja PA, Uransilp N, Watcharakorn A, Piyabhan P. Accuracy of carotid Duplex criteria in diagnosis of significant carotid stenosis in Asian patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018; 27:778-82.
[18] Hua Y, Ling C, Duan C, Zhang L. Evaluation of accuracy for combining color duplex imaging and transcranial Doppler ultrasound in diagnosing severe stenosis or occlusion of internal carotid artery. Chin J Ultrasonogr 2000; 9:413-5.
[19] Mohebali J, Patel VI, Romero JM, Hannon KM, Jaff MR, Cambria RP, et al. Acoustic shadowing impairs accurate characterization of stenosis in carotid ultrasound examinations. J Vasc Surg 2015; 62:1236-44.
[20] Matula C, Trattnig S, Tschabitscher M, Day JD, Koos WT. The course of the prevertebral segment of the vertebral artery: anatomy and clinical significance. Surg Neuro 1997; 48:125-31.
[21] Nagata T, Masumoto K, Hayashi Y, Watanabe Y, Kato Y, Katou F. Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of variations of the carotid artery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44:734-42.
[22] Beigelman R, Izaguirre A, Robles M, Grana D, Ambrosio G, Milei J. Kinking of carotidarteries is not a mechanism of cerebral ischemia: a functional evaluation by Doppler echography. Int Angio 2011; 30:342-8.
[23] Togay-I?ikay C, Kim J, Betterman K, Andrews C, Meads D, Tesh P, et al. Carotid artery tortuosity, kinking, coiling: stroke risk factor, marker, or curiosity? Acta Neurol Belg 2005; 105:68-72.
[24] Cvetko E. Concurrence of bilateral kinking of the extracranial part of the internal carotid artery with coiling and tortuosity of the external carotid artery—a case report. Rom Morphol Embryo 2014; 55:433-5.
[25] Illuminati G, Ricco JB, Caliò FG, D'Urso A, Ceccanei G, Vietri F, Results in a consecutive series of 83 surgical corrections of symptomatic stenotic kinking of the internal carotid artery. Surgery 2008; 143:134-9.
[26] Xia MY, Hua Y, Jia LY, Zhou YH. Study on overestimation of blood flow velocity after bilateral internal carotid artery stenosis with color Doppler ultrasound. Chin J Cerebrovas Dis 2011; 8:570-5.
[27] Romero JM, Lev MH, Chan ST, Connelly MM, Curiel RC, Jackson AE, et al. US of neurovascular occlusive disease: interpretive pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics 2002; 22:1165-76.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

Content
For Authors
For Reviewers
Article Category
Publisher Policies
About
Top 10 Rankings

Share: WeChat

Copyright ©2018 Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy

|

Creative Commons License Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy (AUDT)  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.