| [1] |
King M R. The future of AI in medicine: a perspective from a chatbot. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2022; 51:291-295.
doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-03121-w |
| [2] | Open AI ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/. 2023.03.20 |
| [3] |
Ollivier M, Pareek A, Dahmen J, Kayaalp M E, Winkler P W, Hirschmann M T, et al. A deeper dive into ChatGPT: history, use and future perspectives for orthopaedic research. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31:1190-1192
doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07372-5 |
| [4] | Kitamura F C. ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiology 2023;230171. |
| [5] |
Wang F-Y, Miao Q, Li X, Wang X, Lin Y. What does ChatGPT say: the DAO from algorithmic intelligence to linguistic intelligence. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 2023; 10:575-579.
doi: 10.1109/JAS.2023.123486 |
| [6] |
Owens B. How nature readers are using ChatGPT. Nature 2023; 615:20.
doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00500-8 |
| [7] |
Salvagno M, ChatGpt, Taccone F S, Gerli A G. Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Crit Care 2023; 27:75.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2 |
| [8] |
Hill-Yardin E L, Hutchinson M R, Laycock R, Spencer S J. A Chat(GPT) about the future of scientific publishing. Brain Behav Immun 2023; 110:152-154.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.02.022 |
| [9] | Lecler A, Duron L, Soyer P. Revolutionizing radiology with GPT-based models: current applications, future possibilities and limitations of ChatGPT. Diagn Interv Imaging 2023. |
| [10] |
Macdonald C, Adeloye D, Sheikh A, Rudan I. Can ChatGPT draft a research article? An example of population-level vaccine effectiveness analysis. J Glob Health 2023; 13:01003.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.01003 |
| [11] |
Dahmen J, Kayaalp M E, Ollivier M, Pareek A, Hirschmann M T, Karlsson J, et al. Artificial intelligence bot ChatGPT in medical research: the potential game changer as a double-edged sword. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31:1187-1189.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07355-6 |
| [12] | Open AI GPT-4. https://openai.com/product/gpt-4. 2023.03.20. |
| [13] |
van Dis E A M, Bollen J, Zuidema W, van Rooij R, Bockting C L. ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature 2023; 614:224-226.
doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 |
| [14] | Zheng H and Zhan H. ChatGPT in Scientific Writing: A Cautionary Tale. Am J Med 2023:S0002. |
| [15] |
Stokel-Walker C and Van Noorden R. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature 2023; 614:214-216.
doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6 |
| [16] | Rozencwajg S and Kantor E. Elevating scientific writing with ChatGPT: a guide for reviewers, editors. and authors. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2023;101209. |
| [17] | Shen Y, Heacock L, Elias J, Hentel K D, Reig B, Shih G, et al. ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiology 2023;230163. |
| [18] |
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature 2023; 613:612.
doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1 |
| [19] | Seghier ML. ChatGPT: not all languages are equal. Nature 2023; 615:216. |
| [20] | Liebrenz M, Schleifer R, Buadze A, Bhugra D and Smith A. Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing. Lancet Digit Health 2023; 5:e105-e106. |
| [21] | Hu G. Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers. Account Res 2023;1-3. |
| No related articles found! |
|
||