[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy ›› 2021, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3): 245-248.doi: 10.37015/AUDT.2021.210003

• • 上一篇    下一篇

  

  • 收稿日期:2021-01-18 修回日期:2021-05-24 出版日期:2021-09-30 发布日期:2021-08-31

Value of Ultrasound Images and Reports Scoring System in Quality Control

Li Qiu, MDa, Yulan Peng, MDa, Qiang Lu, MDa, Yan Luo, MDa,*()   

  1. aDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • Received:2021-01-18 Revised:2021-05-24 Online:2021-09-30 Published:2021-08-31
  • Contact: Yan Luo, MD E-mail:luoyan15957@126.com

Abstract:

Objective: To assess the value of ultrasound images and reports scoring system for quality control in clinical ultrasound practice.
Methods: Ultrasound images and reports scoring system was established and implemented in the Department of Medical Ultrasound at West China Hospital of Sichuan University in 2014. The scoring system along with formulated corresponding management measures was used for quality control of ultrasound examination and clinical practice assessment. The quantitative scoring results were summarized and analyzed.
Results: Through the quantitative assessment of the quality of the images and reports of ultrasound examinations, the total report score in our department had risen from 4.93 in 2014 to 4.98 in 2018. “Inconsistency between description and conclusion” accounted for 46.47% of all report errors, which was the most common report error. The total image score also increased slightly to ≥ 4.98 during the past three years. The most common image error was “not saving color Doppler images”, which accounted for 84.48% of all image errors. The total score of images was higher than that of text reports.
Conclusion: It is important to establish the ultrasound images and reports scoring system for quality control of ultrasound practice. Using quantitative scores for ultrasound images and reports can improve the quality control of ultrasound examination and strengthen the management of clinical operation.

Key words: Ultrasound, Image, Report, Quality control, Clinical management

[1] Mrazek-Pugh B, Blumenfeld YJ, Lee HC, Chueh J. Obstetric ultrasound quality improvement initiative-utilization of a quality assurance process and standardized checklists. Am J Perinatol 2015; 32:599-604.
[2] Zhang YF, Li J, Jin LY, Li FS. An intelligent reminder system reduces deficiencies and errors in ultrasound reports. J Ultrasound Med 2020.
[3] Bates JA, Conlon RM, Irving HC. An audit of the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasound. Clin Radiol 1994; 49:617-620.
[4] Caserta MP, Bonnett SL, La Valley MC, De Meo S, Bowman AW. Ultrasound practice redesign to improve image quality: implementation of a quality control sonographer. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:1644-1652.
[5] Yaqub M, Kelly B, Stobart H, Napolitano R, Noble JA, Papageorghiou AT. Quality-improvement program for ultrasound-based fetal anatomy screening using large-scale clinical audit. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54:239-245.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
[an error occurred while processing this directive]